Jeep Liberty Results Raise Questions About Accident Tests
After Consumer Reports nearly rolls a sport-utility vehicle in an accident avoidance test, the magazine labels the vehicle unsafe and urges its readers to buy something else. When AutoWeek magazine rolls an SUV in a slalom test, causing slight injuries to the driver, the weekly publication reminds its readers that sport-utilities shouldn't be driven as aggressively as cars. The conclusions and the missions of the two magazines could hardly be more different, with one the guardian of consumer interests, the other aimed at car enthusiasts and racing fans. The result, however, is the same: Vehicle manufacturers claim the tests do not represent real-world safety, and consumers again are left to wonder how the vehicles would perform in their hands.
In its June 2001 issue, Consumer Reports said a 2001 Mitsubishi Montero would have rolled over in an accident-avoidance test that simulates rapid lane changes if it had not been equipped with aluminum outriggers. AutoWeek, in its Nov. 26 2001 issue, reports that a 2002 Jeep Liberty Sport rolled over at the end of a slalom test in which a driver steers through cones at the highest possible speed.
The Liberty was traveling about 40 mph when it did one complete roll, possibly two, and landed on its wheels with damage to most body panels. Test driver Pete Albrecht suffered cuts to his hands and a sore neck.
AutoWeek has conducted this test since 1992 on "hundreds of vehicles and several dozen SUVs," executive editor Kevin Wilson said, and the Liberty is the first to roll over. "The test is not designed to measure for safety or rollovers. It's our seat-of-the-pants handling evaluation," Wilson said. In addition to clocking a vehicle's speed, the slalom test also measures steering response, balance and weight transfer.
Jeep spokesman Rick Deneau maintains the Liberty is safe on- and off-road and said it has performed well in simulated accident avoidance maneuvers, such as a double lane change. "AutoWeek's test is a slalom to measure speed, and bears little or no resemblance to avoidance maneuvers," Deneau said.
Wilson acknowledges that AutoWeek's test, in which the driver weaves around eight cones spaced 70 feet apart, does not represent a real-world driving situation. "An ordinary driver is not likely to make seven lane changes in 500 feet," he said. But Wilson said it reinforces the notion that SUVs handle differently than cars because they are taller and have a higher center of gravity, which is why the federal government requires manufacturers to post warning labels in all SUVs. "People drive them instead of cars, and they disregard the warning label that is on the sun visor of every SUV," Wilson said, pointing out that the warning label shows a vehicle tipped onto two wheels. "We thought this was a good opportunity to tell people not to drive these vehicles like cars."
Unlike Consumer Reports, AutoWeek makes no recommendations on whether readers should avoid the Liberty or whether Jeep should modify the vehicle to improve its handling ability. Consumer Reports has not tested the Liberty, and AutoWeek has not tested the Montero.
"We're not in the business of engineering cars. We're not Consumer Reports, and we don't put a big red 'not acceptable' label on a vehicle," Wilson said. "We test the cars, and we report what happened. We give our readers the information, and they behave accordingly."
Deneau said an accident reconstruction expert hired by Jeep concluded that Albrecht, the test driver, continued the test run after the Liberty lifted two of its wheels and accelerated toward the finish. Without blaming the rollover on driver error, Deneau said, Albrecht should have ended the run when the Liberty tipped onto two wheels. "At that point, you should lift off (the accelerator) and end the run. We certainly would not be trying to go faster," Deneau said. "Arguably, it could have been avoided if they had pulled out of the run."
Wilson said Albrecht doesn't remember what happened after he cleared the seventh of eight cones, except he thought he "had the run in the bag." "We're not pointing the finger at Jeep in any way," Wilson said. "I think it would be inappropriate for them to point the finger at the driver."
- World premiere: BMW 5 Series crash test with automatic braking system
- Volvo Warning Systems And Gaining Autofranare Balancing Test By ADAC
- Cosmetic Crash Parts Are Irrelevant To Auto Safety
- U.S.: Ford and Chrysler recalls over 50,000 cars in service
- Japanese automaker secured top among best car value list