Home arrow Traffic and Safety arrow Older Drivers, Elderly Driving, Seniors at the Wheel
Older Drivers, Elderly Driving, Seniors at the Wheel

Older Drivers, Elderly Driving

In the next 20 years the number of elderly drivers (persons 70 & over) is predicted to triple in the United States. As age increases, older drivers generally become more conservative on the road. Many mature drivers modify their driving habits (for instance to avoid busy highways or night-time driving) to match their declining capabilities. However, statistics show that older drivers are more likely than younger ones to be involved in multi-vehicle crashes, particularly at intersections.

Research on age-related driving concerns has shown that at around the age of 65 drivers face an increased risk of being involved in a vehicle crash. After the age of 75, the risk of driver fatality increases sharply, because older drivers are more vulnerable to both crash-related injury and death. Three behavioral factors in particular may contribute to these statistics: poor judgement in making left-hand turns; drifting within the traffic lane; and decreased ability to change behavior in response to an unexpected or rapidly changing situation.

Concern about the increased number of older drivers and their potentially decreased driving abilities is growing, especially among younger drivers. Statistics, based on all people injured or killed in traffic crashes, indicate that older drivers are at a disproportionate risk for becoming involved in fatal crashes. A NHTSA study of 1995 FARS (Fatal Accident Reporting System) data reports that senior citizens accounted for:

  • 5% of all people injured in traffic crashes
  • 13% of all traffic fatalities
  • 13% of all vehicle occupant fatalities
  • 18% of all pedestrian fatalities

In a 1997 NHTSA study, older people made up 9 percent of the population but accounted for 14 percent of all traffic fatalities and 17 percent of all pedestrian fatalities. NHTSA's "Traffic Safety Facts 1997: Older Population" (DOT HS 808 769) reports that:

  • In 1997, more than 24 million people in the United States were over 70 years of age.
  • Representing 9 percent of the population in 1997, the 70-and-older age group grew 2.1 times faster from 1987 to 1997 than the total population.
  • In 1986 older drivers were 7 percent of licensed drivers; in 1996 they were 19 percent of licensed drivers.
  • Of traffic fatalities involving older drivers, 82 percent happened in the daytime, 71 percent occurred on weekdays, and 75 percent involved a second vehicle.
  • When a crash involved an older driver and a younger driver, the older driver was 3 times as likely as the younger driver to be the one struck. Moreover, 28 percent of crash-involved older drivers were turning left when they were struck-- 7 times more often than younger drivers were struck while making left turns.
  • Older drivers involved in fatal crashes and fatally injured older pedestrians claimed the lowest proportion of intoxication--defined as a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10 grams per deciliter or higher.
  • While only 55 percent of adult vehicle occupants (ages 18 to 69) involved in fatal crashes were using restraints at the time of the crash, 70 percent of fatal- crash-involved older occupants were using restraints.
  • "On the basis of estimated annual travel, the fatality rate for drivers 85 and over is nine times as high as the rate for drivers 25 through 69 years old."

Statistics show that in two-vehicle fatal crashes involving an older and a younger driver, it is 3.1 times as likely that the vehicle driven by the older person will be struck. In 27% of these two-vehicle fatal crashes the older driver was turning left. Drivers over 65, along with new teen-age drivers, have the highest accident rates per miles driven. Another NHTSA study found that on the basis of estimated annual travel, the fatality rate for drivers 85 and over is nine times as high as the rate for drivers 25 through 69 years old.

Lawrence Nitz, a political scientist from the University of Hawaii, conducted a three-year study of Hawaiian traffic records and found that drivers over 75 were far more likely than other motorists to be cited for certain offenses, including failing to yield to pedestrians, backing up unsafely and failing to stop at a flashing red light.

What is being done to address the problem?

Mandatory driving tests - California, which requires retesting for anyone involved in a fatal crash or three or more crashes in one year, requires drivers over 70 to retest if they are involved in two or more crashes in one year. Proposals in several other states to toughen licensing requirements for older drivers have been thwarted by senior-citizen lobbying groups (AARP & others), who say age-based measures are discriminatory. They claim that a person's chronological age is not an accurate predictor of driving ability. The lobbyists argue that if seniors are forced to take mandatory roadtests in the absence of an incident, other age groups should be required to take them as well.

Deficit reporting laws - Pennsylvania is one state that has a physician's reporting law, requiring physicians to report disabilities that may affect driving ability. Some physicians, however, are reluctant to jeopardize their relationship with a patient by making such a referral. Most other states do not require physicians to report psychomotor, visual, and cognitive deficiencies that may affect drivingto licensing agencies.

What else can be done?

  • Deficit screening - Screening could be given to all drivers for whom age-related decline is suspected and whose performance is viewed as a safety concern for themselves and other motorists. In addition, health professionals and others who work with older populations could administer the tests. Screening could become a part of the regular process of license renewal. By reducing testing time, drivers could be quickly screened and identified either as capable, or as in need of further testing.
  • Crash statistics - DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) and insurance company records can help identify high-risk older drivers. In addition to crash counts, the details of the crash (roadway condition, time of day, location, fault) are important. Some crash patterns (e.g., the driver stopped in the middle of the roadway) may be better predictors of future crashes than others. Given that many older drivers involved in crashes have never had a crash before and may not have another one during the following year, crash records will identify only a few high-risk older drivers. However, crash statistics may be an important part of a comprehensive program to identify high-risk older drivers.

What can you do? - You may wonder about older friends and family members' performance on the road. You want to support their continued mobility but on the other hand you worry about their driving abilities. Unfortunately we don't all retain the ability to drive a car throughout our lifetime. Physical disabilities, mental illness, medications, loss of vision, or frailty can end anyone's driving career prematurely. Before you bring up the subject, keep in mind that the thought of losing a driver's license is very disturbing to most older people. Americans rely upon their cars to get to work, go to the doctor, go shopping, and visit their friends and relatives. The elderly equate losing their driving privileges with being dependent, feeling trapped, perhaps losing choice, control, and spontaneity in life. Discussing driving skill with an older person requires great diplomacy.

AgeQuest, a specialty firm addressing the training needs of professionals in the field of aging, older adults, and family caregivers, suggests in its publication "Supporting the Mature Driver" that the decline of skills necessary for safe driving sometimes occurs suddenly or subtly. Signs may include a pattern of close calls, violations or collisions, increasing difficulty in noticing pedestrians, signs, objects, or other vehicles; an observable decline in physical abilities; or a rapid onset of fatigue from driving.

Older drivers need to be aware that medications can significantly impair their driving by making them drowsy or distracted. Physicians and pharmacists should be consulted before starting new medications, to see if the drug can affect the ability to drive. Since side effects are often worse for the first few days of a new medication, people should avoid driving until they know exactly how a new drug affects them. If any medication causes sleepiness or disorientation, someone else should do the driving.

Eyes change with age. They lose the ability to focus quickly. Peripheral vision narrows and the retina becomes less sensitive to light. Physical activity is needed to keep a person strong and flexible for those quick reactions needed while driving. To be a safe driver, paying attention to road conditions and your own body changes is essential. A person's chronological age is not an absolute predictor of driving ability, but its impact should not be denied. Ultimately, however, what counts on the road is performance.
Elderly Driving, Seniors at the Wheel

 
Comments
Amanda  - What ever! |2008-05-14 12:54:41
i think that the elderly shouldnt have to take their licenses over because they may be old but they are still human and they want to drive just as much as any person who drives! so i think they shouldnt have to retake their test!
Andrew  - Elderly Driving |2008-05-18 20:34:53
This isn't an attack on the elderly, it's just a topic on how to keep our roads safe. It's been proven that as people get older, they develop diseases and physically degenerate (eyes, reaction time, etc.) We're not saying, "let's take all the old farts licenses away because they drive slow!" We're saying let's test them to make sure that they are still safe drivers. I think you'd think differently if you were the victim in an accident because the elderly man or woman that crashed into you couldn't see or brake in time.
Ben  - Not age discrimination |2008-06-01 19:23:57
It is a proven fact that the elderly tend to have physical and mental disadvantages as they age, therefore, it would be wise to retest their driving skills before letting them on the road with a potential for accidents.
Noreen  - Father in Law |2008-06-17 19:39:24
I know the elderly resent the scrutiny involved in this situation but it should be recognized that many of them should not be driving. My father in law can barely walk, has trouble following a conversation, falls asleep at the drop of a hat, has serious reaction time issues and yet he is still driving. He is in a state that doesn't have any requirement (not even eye exams) for license renewal and frankly I'm afraid he's going to kill himself or someone else. I think once you hit 70 you should be tested every 2 years (on an enclosed driving track) Not eveyone should be driving.
sarah  - strange |2008-06-25 12:15:09
I think that old people shudnt be allowed to drive because they are a danger to the roads and they cause alot of crashes i think that they should give up when they get to 70 because the elderly get free travel on the public transport anyway i think that old people shudnt drive !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
Samantha  - The other guy! |2008-07-02 20:03:03
I am the victom of a elderly car crash an 80 year old man took a left hand turn right in front of me on a high way. He was following a SUV and didnt stop to see if he was clear to turn. I broke my foot and dislocated it in three places, my boyfriend broke his leg and his right foot was ejected out the windshield. I lost every thing! The ability to walk, my car,job, apartment, and I still have sever pain and artheritus in my foot. He didnt even get a ticket for causing the accident. I think you will sing a different tune when it happens to you!
This topic is important to me and all of the people that will be driving in the next ten years. The baby boomers will be about 70 then and will make up a large number of the motorist that will inhabit our streets!
roxanne  - Amanda-wake up and smell the coffee |2008-07-23 19:19:03
unfortunatley getting old does bring up many issues especially about driving.
Tell me you haven't seen elderly people crossing the middle line, cut in front of traffic or almost hit another car. Elderly people tend to lose thier motor skills, cognition, eye sight and thier hearing which makes them more vulnerable to getting into an accident. So, in your opinion, your going to say "let them drive because they want to and they like to drive" Think about the consequences of your statement. It is proven that as people get older (65+), they cause more accidents and fatalities. They need to be retested to make sure that they can drive safely on the streets. I don't know why you wouldn't want that for one of your loved ones. that is what is wrong with this world...it is called IGNORANCE!!!!!!!
Heather  - Accept it! |2008-07-25 01:17:35
I've been actively avoiding tragedy from elderly drivers for 35 years and it's only going to get worse with the aging of the baby boomers. Why fight it?
Instead, we should embrace our American flare for independence and create a form of bumper/smart car and then designate or create lanes specifically for elderly, beginning, or otherwise impaired, drivers' use, should they choose. It would take years, but we do it for bicycles!
We need to stop trying to control other people from our fear, and figure out how to deal with reality.
Chris  - Agree- test over the age of 70! |2008-07-30 21:32:56
I am in absolute agreement with many others on this board. My Mother was recently rear-ended at a red light by a 94 year old man. It seemed to be minor so Mom turned in to the nearest parking lot and waived him to come in too. He just kept on going and never did stop. Luckily, she was able to write down the license number and called the police. When they went to talk to the man, he didn't even know he hit her and didn't see her wave him in the lot. Nobody was hurt thankfully but it did cause 00 damage to her bumper.

Another situation recently in our town. A teen driver was sideswiped by an elderly person. He was waiting in the middle of an intersection to turn left and the elder, who was in the through lane, decided half way through the intersection to turn left. So he turned, and turned right into the car waiting to turn that was in the correct lane. The teen then followed the elder to KMart (go figure) and the elder didn't even know he hit the teen's car and was trying to say that the teen turned in front of him.

I live in a state where elderly driving legislation will NEVER pass as the demographics are heavily senior. But it HAS to be considered in every state.
casey  - talk to my grandmother |2008-08-27 16:07:38
i cant agree more! my grandmother is 64 and it almost seems like her brain is dying. she has gotten so slow with everything. she can barley get my name right half the time.
someone needs to bring this topic to justice.
Boomer  - elderly driving |2008-10-13 13:24:47
some elderly people may know how to drive well and others may not. my grandfather only has one eye and he drives better than most people i know. i think they should be able to keep their liscences.
adam  - elderly driving |2008-10-19 18:27:48
I agree completely with this subject, there is still many older drivers (65+) on the roads who are safe and are still able to drive carefully and whos reaction times, eyes and hearing havent yet deteriated.

However, there are also many older drivers who arent as quick with their reactions or eyesight and who are still driving, i think this is very selfish because they are not only putting themselves at risk but also other innocent drivers. I realise it is not their fault and they still wish to drive but it is dangerous and after all the data and statistics i have seen on the matter i have come to the conclusion that elderly drivers cause a large percentage of accidents on our roads.

Many older drivers realise they cannot drive as well as they used to. Some decide to drive only during the daytime and on quiet roads. These are the rational, sensible ones.

As for being tested every 2-3 years after the age of 70, i think is a very good idea because there are older people out there who are still capable of driving sensibly. This will also cut down on the amount of elderly drivers who arent capable of this and will help to make our roads safer.
Amanda  - elderly drivers |2008-10-20 14:59:36
It's not age discrimination. Just like we all had to take driving tests to get our licenses, we should all have to continue taking tests to make sure that we are still mentally and physically capable of being able to drive safe. You don't let your friend get in the car and drive after 10 beers do you? Then why would you let someone who can barely hear and/or see drive? When people get older their response time declines, and should be tested in my opinion at least every year.
kalesss :] ( im only 13)  - elderly drivers |2008-10-22 22:18:28
i agree completely. its not that old people arent responsible, it's just that they cant see as well anymore and the cant turn their neck to see if other people are coming :]
Tess  - On my way to work this morning |2008-10-24 01:30:32
I was t-boned by an 82 year old woman who didn't see her light turn red even though it was a 2 lane highway and everyone else was stopped...she ran right into me and i'm fortunate that i am able to type this right now. Thanks for plastic cars lol...she had plenty of obvious clues that she should be stopped such as the traffic in the intersection and the lanes of stopped traffic and lets not forget the big red light!! I work for an optometrist and see elders coming in all of the time with their cataracts and retinal issues and they all drive themselves there. There's nothing we can do if they wear their glasses and can be corrected to 20/40. Pennsylvania does require doctors to notify Penndot if there are medical condition that could cause problems. I have a friends who's mother has alzhiemers and the doctor says she can drive even though my friend has told the doctor that she thinks she should no longer be driving. I will be making my voice heard in this matter. mandatory physical road driving every 4 years after the age of 60. no closed courses. that doesn't demonstrate ones ability to drive in the real world with others on the road.
Aly  - I work with them. |2008-10-24 14:19:24
I work at a retirement home and I have seen the elderly there get in accidents with their WALKERS. They constantly crash into each other with their walkers and get their wheels and handlebars and oxygen tubes tangled up. I can't even fathom how they would do behind the wheel of a car.
Loren  - Elderly drivers |2008-10-30 00:15:44
Driving is not a right it's a privilege. Those who can't do it safely any more can and should have they're license revoked. Not having to pay for gas and insurance would open up the possibility of them to take a cab or bus were ever they need to go.
San  - new laws needed |2008-11-04 18:24:19
Their is nothing at all wrong with having more extensive testing for the elderly. I'm all for it. It has nothing to do with age discrimination. Come on give me a break. It's all about feeling safe on the road. I'm not trying to condemn all elderly. I mean their are some who are in great shape and have all of their mental capacities. But then their are some who just shouldn't be behind the wheel. You wouldn't give a kid a loaded gun to play with, would you?
julia  - writing a paper on elderly driving |2008-11-10 22:09:12
i totally agree with passing a law to enforce safer conditions on the road. Nothing against the elderly, but everyone had to take a test to start driving and we should all have to take more when we get older to ensure the safety of ourselves and others on the road. I say elderly drivers should be requried to take a test at the age of 65+ every 4 years to keep the peace on the road. And this is with the permission of their doctors that they are capable to drive both physically and mentally. It's just common sense.
Write comment
Name:
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
 
< Prev   Next >