Home arrow Driving Guideline arrow Sharing the Road With Bicycles
Sharing the Road With Bicycles

Sharing the Road With Bicycles

A bicycle is considered a vehicle on the roadway and has exactly the same rights as any other vehicle.

Bicycling is one of the most popular recreational activities in the United States, indeed, in the world. There are over 90,000,000 cyclists in the U. S. and over 30,000,000 adult cyclists. In any given year we can expect 800 - 1000 cyclists to die on our roadways while some 500,000 will be treated for injuries. In fact, the first automobile accident in the United States occurred when a motor vehicle crashed into a pedal cycle rider in New York City in 1896!

How to Avoid Six Potential Accident Situations

Listed below are the six most common bicycle-related accidents and ways to avoid them. The types of accidents are listed in order from most common to least common.

1. Motorist's Failure To Yield
(approximately 30 percent of bicycle-related accidents)

  • Causes:
    a) Motorist pulls out from a stop sign and fails to yield to cyclist or,
    b) turns left in front of oncoming bike.
  • How to avoid:
    As you approach an intersection, don't hug the curb. If you are going straight, ride approximately where the right wheel of a car would be if it was going straight. Put your hands on the brake levers and watch closely. Be prepared for an emergency maneuver.

2. Cyclist's Failure To Yield
(approximately 30 percent of bicycle-related accidents)

  • Causes:
    Cyclists who don't yield, who ride out of driveways without stopping, or run red lights and stop signs, or turn left in front of oncoming cars.
  • How to avoid:
    Easy! Wait for traffic to clear. Stop for red lights and stop signs. Don't turn left unless you have checked for traffic and it is clear.

3. No Lights At Night
(approximately 18 percent of bicycle-related accidents)

  • Causes:
    Bicyclists who ride without lights are hit in many different situations - by turning cars, by overtaking cars, by cars pulling out from stop signs.
  • How to avoid:
    Easy, again. Use proper lights.

4. Wrong-Way Riding
(approximately 10 percent of bicycle-related accidents)

  • Causes:
    These typically involve a cyclist being hit by a car turning or emerging from a side street. The motorist doesn't look in the wrong direction for oncoming traffic and POW!
  • How to avoid:
    Ride with traffic, as required by law.

5. Being Hit From Behind
(approximately 7 percent of bicycle-related accidents)

  • Causes:
    Overtaking car, unlit cyclist at night. Some involve drunk drivers.
  • How to avoid:
    Become proficient at looking over your shoulder without swerving. Get a rear view mirror. Occasionally checking traffic to the rear can help you blend better with the flow of cars, buses, trucks and other bikes.

6. Opening Car Doors
(approximately 5 percent of bicycle-related accidents)

  • Causes:
    Someone opens a parked car door in front of an overtaking bike. Typically, the motorist fails to check for traffic before emerging. This is, by the way, illegal and the collision is the motorists' fault.
  • How to avoid:
    Never ride closer than three feet to a parked car.

Cars Passing Bikes - Close Encounters & Wrecks

About a year ago I was asked to contribute a chapter to a new book entitled Bicycle Accident Reconstruction and Litigation. The book has just been released and, while you won't find it on the New York Times bestseller list, it does offer some fascinating insights into bike accident litigation from all over the country.

One of the most common bike accident scenarios involves motorists colliding with cyclists while overtaking them. It's not difficult to understand why. My experience is that motorists perceive that lane lines are absolute and believe that they cannot cross them when passing cyclists. If they can squeeze between you and the lane line, they will do so no matter how close they come to you. Once they break the plane and cross the lane line they will usually allow sufficient room to pass. [I modestly call this the "Magas Phenomenon."] In Effective Cycling," John Forester recommends riding in the center of narrow lanes and just to the right of cars in wide lanes in order to encourage the motorist leave the lane to pass you and to give you some room to dive if you need it!. Cars still manage to frequently collide with cyclists during the execution of the passing maneuver and in Bicycle Accident Reconstruction and Litigation there is a virtual catalog of dozens of reported cases on this issue.

An interesting case arose in Idaho in the 1960's. A 14 year old boy was riding on a narrow gravel shoulder of a two lane 24 foot wide highway. A motorist came upon the boy at 55 mph. A disinterested witness said the boy appeared to be having problems controlling his bike on the gravel and said the motorist neither slowed nor steered left. As the motorist approached, the bike operator sweved left onto the roadway in front of the car and was killed. The point of impact was one to two feet onto the roadway. The court ruled that the cyclist was entitled to use the right edge of the roadway as a matter of law since Idaho law, like Ohio law, requires cyclists to ride as far to the right as is practicable. The court stated that a motorist may not assume that a bike operator traveling on the berm will stay on the berm since he has a legal right to ride on the roadway. Kelley v. Bruch (Id. 1966), 415 P.2d 693.

In a 1987 Ohio case a motorist argued that he lost the cyclist "in the sun" while passing The jury, for some unknown reason, found the cyclist to be 20% negligent when the motorist struck the cyclist. The court determined that the motorists argument was not a legal excuse to hit the cyclist and found that the jury made a mistake when assigning any blame for the accident to the cyclist. Howard v. McKitrick, Lexis Slip Opinion, Ohio App., July 2, 1987.

In Ohio, a passing motorist must sound a horn before passing and the motorist is negligent if he fails to do so. However, courts have also held that a horn blown in an untimely fashion which scares a cyclist and causes the cyclist to move unexpectedly or lose control is also negligence. In one case a cyclist heard a horn close by, turned to look and moved left into a passing car. The jury found the cyclist to be 95% responsible for the wreck, but the trial judge reversed the jury's findings and found the motorist to be 75% responsible!

The bottom line...keep an eye in your mirror and watch out for those passing motorists. Take up your fair share of the roadway and make motorists get into the other lane to pass you. Drive defensively people....as a famous TV character used to say..."Let's be careful out there...."

Bicycling is one of the most popular recreational activities in the United States, indeed, in the world. There are over 90,000,000 cyclists in the U. S. and over 30,000,000 adult cyclists. In any given year we can expect 800 - 1000 cyclists to die on our roadways while some 500,000 will be treated for injuries. In fact, the first automobile accident in the United States occurred when a motor vehicle crashed into a pedal cycle rider in New York City in 1896!

ORC Section 4511.01(A) - Defines "vehicles" to include "bicycles." This very important statute has the impact of making all laws restricting the behavior of "vehicle operators" applicable to cyclists. By defining "vehicles" to include bikes, the legislature has indicated its approval of bikes as transportation devices with a place on the roadway. This definition means that virtually every traffic law, including speeding, drunk driving, traffic control device rules, reckless operation, passing rules and the like, apply to motorists and cyclists alike. Cyclists are required to ride in the proper lane, are not permitted to ride "against traffic" and, generally, must act like any other vehicle on the roadway.

ORC Section 4511.52 - This section specifically makes all traffic laws applicable to bicycles whenever a bike is operated on any road or "any path set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles." Thus, you can be cited by the police for reckless operation, drunk driving, speeding and the like even while riding on a bike path!

ORC Section 4511.53 - Requires bike riders to only ride upon the "permanent and regular seat" attached to the bike and prohibits a cyclist from carrying any other person on a bike except upon a "firmly attached and regular seat."

This section also:

Prohibits bicycle operation where one hand cannot be kept on the handle bars due to your carrying any "package, bundle, or article."

Prohibits using a bike to "carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped"

ORC Section 4511.54 - Prohibits a cyclist from attaching his bike or himself to any other vehicle on the roadway. Thus, we are not permitted to grab onto those little ladders that are seen on the backs of conversion vans, and get pulled along as the van speeds away from a stoplight.

ORC Section 4511.55 - Requires cyclists to ride "as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable." This section of the law is practically universal across the country and generates much concern among cyclists. As a practical matter, it rarely comes into play until there is an accident and a cyclist is hurt. The defense then typically argues that the cyclist was not riding "as far to the right as practicable" and was therefore in some way responsible for his or her own injuries. I have always argued, sometimes successfully, that this means "as far to the right as is reasonably safe to ride given the road conditions, traffic, and all other factors." I argue that this gives us, at least, half the lane and does not bind us to within inches of the white line.

Section 4511.55 also permits cyclists to ride "two abreast" on the roadway except in bike lanes and on bike paths. There is a bit of a conflict with being permitted to ride two abreast and being required to "ride as far to the right as practicable." I have always argued that since we are permitted to ride two abreast, we are entitled to use the entire lane when doing so -- one half lane for each rider.

ORC Section 4511.56 - Defines lights and reflectors needed for night riding and requires:

- a "bell or other device capable of giving a signal audible for a distance of at least 100 feet." [Sirens and whistles may not be used.]

-an "adequate brake" for roadway use (i.e., no track bikes on the road).

 
Comments
Martha L Shively  - A Long-time Courteous Driver |2009-06-18 03:06:57
I do have a comment or two about bicyclists on the nation's highways. Maybe some law includes bicycles as the same as a motor-powered vehicle, but, alas, they cause motorists to swerve in the lane of oncoming traffic, or to slam on brakes unless the roadway is straight and clear; this, to me, is the cyclist's fault. Many of them ride their bikes on turn-filled roadways, knowing that vehicles are going to be in both lanes; they almost defy a driver to claim any part of the proper lane, and they refuse to move over in order to promote safe passing for the vehicle. I have seen one accident that could have ended in tragedy for the cyclist if the motorist hadn't of had impeccable reactions; it was the cyclist who was ticketed for refusal to yield to the driver! In my opinion (and everyone has one), I believe that the roads were created for motorists, not cyclists. If I was still able to ride my bike as I used to, I would always get off the road to allow motorists to pass; if it was not safe to ride off the road, then I stopped and walked my bike off the road. Why should cyclists have rights over and above motorists? Why shouldn't they have to yield to the motorist? It's not like they're riding their bikes to the hospital, or the ER, or the dentist, etc. Most motorists have a plan for their trip; cyclists are doing their riding for recreation, or some type of fitness training. My final comment; cyclists have no business taking over the roadways and expecting motorists to take second place--get a REAL life! Ride your bike in your driveway or in a place especially provided for cyclists!
Chris  - Bicycle Commuter..not a recreational rider.. |2009-10-12 00:08:39
Martha, most people who ride bikes are recreational riders..I give you that. But alot of cyclists rely on their bikes as their means of transportation..have you not heard of that? Alot of people, like myself, cannot afford, or just don't even care to own a car. When I commute on my bike, I expect driver's to go around me safely... and not to be endangered by someone who wants to go buy shoes at the mall. The horn is the most annoying thing from a motorist. About 75 percent of the time when i get honked at its cause they want me off the road, or I am riding too far to the Left..yes, the Left. Cyclists who ride on the white line near the edge of the roadway are 80 percent more likely to get hit. I ride in the center of narrow lanes, and if the lane is wide enough i ride to the Right, but no along the pavement edge..which is dangerous cause motorists will squeeze you off the road. I ride my bike properly and in the safest method I know..but motorists do not, and I do whatever i can to prevent that.
Tom  - Long time courteous driver & 4 season cyclist |2010-01-22 06:24:28
Martha you wrote "... Maybe some law includes bicycles as the same as a motor-powered vehicle, but, alas, they cause motorists to swerve in the lane of oncoming traffic, or to slam on brakes unless the roadway is straight and clear; this, to me, is the cyclist's fault ..."
You need to become better acquainted both with the highway traffic act in your state and with your legal and moral obligations as a licensed operator of a motor vehicle. An attentive, competent and responsible driver will look far enough ahead to see what they're approaching in time to plan and react; not "... swerve in the lane of oncoming traffic, or to slam on brakes ...". If you believe the situation you describe is the cyclist's fault you either have no understanding of the duty of care we all owe to other road users, or you have a very cavalier attitude to the lives and well being of others. These are parents, children, spouses. Please readjust your attitude before you get back behind the wheel.
Stupidity Hater  - Martha L Shively - Please Get a Clue |2010-02-04 18:18:50
Lady, you should turn in your license if you are not going to 1. learn the traffic laws, 2. obey them. Don't forget that you have a license plate on your car and people can use that complain to the DMV about your bad driving. The can also provide it to a lawyer who will sue your moronically, negligent ass for harassment and emotional damage.
Write comment
Name:
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
 
< Prev   Next >